Legal Opinion
Munno v. Amoco Oil Co.
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided March 27, 1980No. Civ. H-79-187PublishedCited by 48 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RULING ON DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
BLUMENFELD, District Judge.
This is an action brought by Joseph Mun-no a franchisee-lessee gasoline dealer, against Amoco Oil Company (“Amoco”) his franchisor-lessor, in which Munno claims that the franchisor is illegally refusing to renew his lease. The plaintiff’s claims arise under the Petroleum Marketing Practices Act, 15 U.S.C. § 2801, et seq. (“PMBA”), 1 and this court has jurisdiction under 15 U.S.C. § 2805 and 28 U.S.C. § 1332. Defendant Amoco has filed counterclaims in which it seeks back rent and possession of its service station.…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Chapman v. Houston Welfare Rights OrganizationSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Philbrook v. GlodgettSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- United States v. William E. SullivanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1969
- Ambook Enterprises v. Time Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1979
- Liberation News Service v. EastlandCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1970
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by48 opinions
- William C. Brach, Cross-Appellant v. Amoco Oil Company, a Maryland Corporation, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1982
- James C. Svela v. Union Oil Company of California, a California CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- Esso Standard Oil Company v. Department of Consumer AffairsCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1986
- Baldauf v. Amoco Oil Co.District Court, W.D. Michigan · 1981
- Byron C. Darling, III v. Mobil Oil CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1989
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.