Bailey v. Interinsurance Exchange
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BEACH, J.
Plaintiff in a declaratory relief action appeals from a judgment for defendant entered following a nonjuiy trial based upon a stipulated set of facts.
At issue is the interpretation of an exclusion clause in the policy of automobile insurance written by the defendant for coverage of the plaintiff. The policy includes a provision for payment of medical expenses. The exclusion under consideration reads as follows; “This policy does not apply to bodily injury sustained by any person if benefits therefor are in whole or in part either payable or required to be provided under any…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Witt v. JacksonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
- Silberg v. California Life InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- Steven v. Fidelity & Casualty Co.California Supreme Court · 1962
- New York Life Insurance v. HollenderCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
- Harris v. Glens Falls InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Griswold v. Union Labor Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
- South Dakota Medical Service, Inc. v. Minnesota Mutual Fire & Casualty Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1981
- Melissa v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- Culligan v. State Compensation Insurance FundCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
- Starrett v. Oklahoma Farmers Union Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1993
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.