Legal Opinion

Harris v. Glens Falls Insurance

California Supreme Court

Decided February 25, 1972No. S. F. 22853PublishedCited by 42 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

MOSK, J.

The sole issue in this case is whether a yacht insurance policy purchased by plaintiff provided coverage for his vessel while it was at sea, a few miles from San Francisco Bay.

Plaintiff acquired a 28-foot ketch in October 1967 for $5,400 and shortly thereafter the vessel was taken to a repair yard in Sausalito for an extensive overhaul. On November 17, he purchased a policy from defendant which provided hull insurance, protection and indemnity insurance, and medical payments insurance for a period of one year. The following March 5, in order to determine the adequacy of the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Gray v. Zurich Insurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1966
  2. California Compensation & Fire Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
  3. Century Bank v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971

3Cited by42 opinions

  1. Reserve Insurance Co. v. PisciottaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
  2. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. JacoberCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
  3. Haynes v. Farmers Insurance ExchangeCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
  4. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance v. CossCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
  5. Delgado v. Heritage Life InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API