Legal Opinion

Silberg v. California Life Insurance

California Supreme Court

Decided May 10, 1974No. L.A. 30144PublishedCited by 226 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*456Opinion

MOSK, J.

We are called upon to interpret the provisions of an insurance policy issued to plaintiff by defendant company and the scope of defendant’s duty to make payment thereunder. The policy provided that defendant would pay the cost of hospital care, including surgeon’s fees, up to a limit of $5,000, with $100 deductible, and there was an exclusion for losses caused by injuries for which compensation was payable under any workmen’s compensation law.

In July 1966, while the policy was in effect, plaintiff was seriously injured and as a result ultimately incurred $6,900 in medical…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Gruenberg v. Aetna InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
  2. Comunale v. Traders & General InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
  3. Crisci v. Security InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
  4. Fletcher v. Western National Life InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
  5. Mercer v. PerezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by226 opinions

  1. Transportation Insurance Co. v. MorielTexas Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Egan v. Mutual of Omaha InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Anderson v. Continental InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Neal v. Farmers Insurance ExchangeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
  5. Sparks v. Republic National Life InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 1982

221 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API