Legal Opinion

Culligan v. State Compensation Insurance Fund

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 8, 2000No. A085913PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

LAMBDEN, J.

This is an appeal by plaintiffs from a judgment for defendant State Compensation Insurance Fund (State Fund) entered after the superior court granted summary judgment. The action, brought by Thomas J. Culligan III, individually and doing business as Culligan Management Company (collectively Culligan), grows out of State Fund’s refusal to defend or indemnify Culligan, under a workers’ compensation and employer’s liability insurance policy, in a third party action brought against Culligan by former Culligan employees. We will affirm the judgment.

Background

Culligan conducted…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Parsons v. Bristol Development Co.California Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Montrose Chemical Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Norgart v. Upjohn Co.California Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Buss v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Horace Mann Ins. Co. v. Barbara B.California Supreme Court · 1993

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Ratcliff Architects v. Vanir Construction Management, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2001
  2. Fischer v. First International BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
  3. Lopez v. C.G.M. Development, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2002
  4. Kalai v. GrayCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
  5. Stephenson v. Argonaut InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API