Baldwin v. Santa Rosa Island Co.
California Supreme Court
MOTION to dismiss an appeal from a decree of distribution of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco. • J. V. Coffey, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
CHIPMAN, C.
Cornelia A. Baldwin appealed to this court from the decree of distribution in the above-entitled matter. Respondent, Santa Rosa Island Company, served and filed its motion to dismiss the appeal, which motion is now to be determined. The grounds of the motion as stated therein were: 1. That the appeal was prematurely taken; that the notice of appeal was filed on July 20, 1901, whereas the decree appealed from was not entered at length in the minutes of the superior court until September 27,1901; 2. That said Cornelia A. Baldwin is not a proper party appellant, and was not aggrieved…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Mackay v. MackayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
- Harnish v. BramerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
- Bell v. StaackeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
- In re Estate of PearsonsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
- In re Estate of ScottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Hahn v. Citizens State BankWyoming Supreme Court · 1918
- Foss v. JohnstoneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910
- Wood, Curtis Co. v. Missouri Etc. Ry. Co.California Supreme Court · 1907
- Banfield v. SchuldermanOregon Supreme Court · 1931
- Estate of DunphyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.