Legal Opinion

Consumers Salt Co. v. Riggins

California Supreme Court

Decided December 4, 1929No. Docket No. L.A. 11592PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCurtis, J.

The facts in this case are not in dispute. Prior to the commencement of this action, one B. D. Mc-Alvay brought an action against B. C. Stockwell and the Consumers Salt Company for the purpose of quieting the title of the former to 225,000 shares of the capital stock of said Consumers Salt Company, a corporation. These shares of stock then stood in the name of Stockwell upon the books of said company, and were evidenced by certificate No. 40. That action resulted in a judgment in favor of McAlvay quieting his title to said stock as prayed for. Stockwell appealed from the judgment and, for the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Chandler v. HartCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
  2. San Joaquin Land & Water Co. v. BeecherCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Balfour-Guthrie Investment Co. v. WoodworthCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
  4. Jones v. PeckCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923
  5. Barrell v. Lake View Land Co.California Supreme Court · 1898

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Lotus Car Ltd. v. Municipal CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
  2. Lotus Car Ltd. v. Municipal CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
  3. McDaniel v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
  4. Sears v. StelznerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1939
  5. Stesel v. Santa Ana River Water Co.California Court of Appeal · 1939

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API