Legal Opinion

McDaniel v. City & County of San Francisco

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 23, 1968No. Civ. 23813PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSalsman, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment denying appellant’s petition for a writ of mandate, dissolving the alternative writ, and adjudging appellant indebted to the retirement fund of the City and County of San Francisco in the amount of $4,708.92.

The facts are not in dispute. Appellant is a cable ear grip-man on the San Francisco Municipal Railway, a civil service position. For a long time prior to the events in this case, his former wife Zereldia McDaniel had ■ regularly attached his earnings pursuant to a judgment for child support. These attachments were made under the procedure described in…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. United States v. Munsey Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. Harris v. BalkSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
  3. Bank of Italy v. JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926
  4. Jones v. MortimerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  5. Sutro Heights Land Co. v. Merced Irrigation DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Kruger v. Wells Fargo BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Barnhill v. Robert Saunders & Co.California Court of Appeal · 1981
  3. McDonald v. Stockton Metropolitan Transit DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973
  4. Arthur Frank Millard v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1990
  5. Johnson v. Contra Costa County Fire Protection DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API