Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Stesel v. Santa Ana River Water Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 11, 1939No. Civ. 2448PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MARKS, J. —

This is an appeal from an order refusing to change the place of trial of the action from the Superior Court of Riverside County to the Superior Court of Los Angeles County.

No question is raised as to the sufficiency of the moving papers. It is admitted that the defendant Santa Ana River Water Company has its principal place of business in Riverside County and that the other corporate defendants have their principal places of business in Los Angeles County. It is also admitted that all of the individual defendants reside in Los Angeles County.

Two principal questions are presented…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Smith v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Donohoe v. WoosterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
  3. Bardwell v. TurnerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
  4. Weygandt v. LarsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
  5. Howe v. TuckerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Vaughan v. RobertsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
  2. Hays v. CowlesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
  3. Carlsbad Mutual Water Co. v. San Luis Rey Development Co.California Court of Appeal · 1947
  4. Salt Lake City Corp. v. Cahoon & Maxfield Irrigation Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Keithly v. LaceyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API