Legal Opinion
Jones v. Peck
California Court of Appeal
Decided August 4, 1923No. Civ. No. 4196PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtFinlayson, P. J.
This is an action to recover the possession of mining properties, and to enjoin the defendants from removing certain improvements, fixtures, and machinery. Judgment passed for the plaintiffs other than Berry and Rives. The appeal is by the defendants, C. B. Conlin and E. C. Eddie.
The complaint alleges the following facts: On March 4, 1916, the Bagdad Mining & Milling Company, a California corporation (hereafter, for brevity, referred to as the Bag-dad Company), was the owner of the Bagdad mine, in San Bernardino County, consisting of a contiguous group of ten mining locations situated about…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Belk v. MeagherSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
- Payne & Dewey v. TreadwellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1860
- Hammer v. Garfield Mining & Milling Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1889
- Montecito Valley Water Co. v. City of Santa BarbaraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
- Bank of Lemoore v. FulghamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Union Sugar Co. v. Hollister Estate Co.California Supreme Court · 1935
- Century Surety Co. v. PolissoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
- In Re the Unauthorized Practice of Law of EllisHawaii Supreme Court · 1971
- Consumers Salt Co. v. RigginsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
- Storrs v. Belmont Gold Mining & Milling Co.California Court of Appeal · 1938
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.