Legal Opinion
Lotus Car Ltd. v. Municipal Court
California Court of Appeal
Decided June 19, 1968No. Civ. No. 25162PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMolinari, P. J.
This is an appeal from the judgment of the superior court denying a petition for a writ of mandate seeking to compel the municipal court to quash service of summons on petitioner. The real party in interest, Robert Ward, brought the original action in the municipal court against Rod Carbeth Enterprises, Inc. and petitioner, Lotus Car Ltd. (hereafter referred to as “Lotus”), alleging negligent manufacture of a Lotus automobile and breach of warranty with respect thereto and asking property damages arising out of a collision against an embankment in this state. The municipal court ordered…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- City of Los Angeles v. GageCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
- Fisher Governor Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
- Henry R. Jahn & Son, Inc. v. Superior Court of San Mateo CountyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
- Hunt v. Mayor & Council of RiversideCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Citizens Ass'n for Sensible Development of Bishop Area v. County of InyoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
- Weber v. City CouncilCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
- Franklin v. Municipal CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
- Rodriguez v. Municipal CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
- California Standardbred Sires Stakes Committee, Inc. v. California Horse Racing BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.