Legal Opinion

Balfour-Guthrie Investment Co. v. Woodworth

California Supreme Court

Decided March 30, 1899No. S. F. No. 1101PublishedCited by 17 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Oourt of Fresno County and from an order denying a new trial. J. R. Webb, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtHarrison, J.

The appellant executed a deed of trust of certain lands in the county of Fresno, March 12, 1890, to Robert Balfour and Robert B. Forman, to secure the payment of certain indebtedness to the respondent. The deed of trust provided that, in case of any default in the payment of said indebtedness, the trustees, upon the request of the respondent, should sell the lands, after giving certain notice, and apply the proceeds to the payment of said indebtedness. It was also provided in the deed of trust that the respondent might, by a resolution of its board of directors, appoint other trustee or…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Sacramento Bank v. AlcornCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Moore v. HopkinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  3. Toland v. TolandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
  4. Granger v. Original Empire Mill & Mining Co.California Supreme Court · 1881
  5. Barrell v. Lake View Land Co.California Supreme Court · 1898

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Raulet v. Northwestern Nat'l Ins. Co. of MilwaukeeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910
  2. Chandler v. HartCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
  3. Collins v. RamishCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
  4. Sharp v. Scottish Union & National InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
  5. Consumers Salt Co. v. RigginsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API