Legal Opinion

Craig v. Shea

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 31, 1919No. Civ. No. 3160PublishedCited by 13 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County. L. T. Price, Judge. Reversed. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the Court

WOOD, J., pro tem.

This is an appeal from a judgment awarding $3,750 damages for false representations made by the agent of defendant upon the sale of a thirty-acre walnut grove. Mr. Craig died after the entry of judgment, and the executrix of his will has been substituted as plaintiff.

There is no dispute as to the representations made by the agent of defendant. It is alleged in the complaint, and the plaintiff testified at the trial, that he purchased the property believing and relying upon such representations, which were “That fifteen acres of the 'grove was planted to trees of the age of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Colton v. StanfordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Samson v. BealeWashington Supreme Court · 1902
  3. Oppenheimer v. ClunieCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  4. Maxon-Nowlin Co. v. NorswingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
  5. Elliott v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1904

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. In Re Cheryl E.California Court of Appeal · 1984
  2. Pacific Royalty Co. v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1955
  3. Elkind v. WoodwardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
  4. Wolfe v. SevernsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
  5. Shirreffs v. Alta Canyada Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1935

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API