Legal Opinion

Shirreffs v. Alta Canyada Corp.

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 14, 1935No. Civ. 1713PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJennings, J.

Plaintiffs instituted this action for the purpose of rescinding a contract which they had made with the defendant, Alta Canyada Corporation, whereby they agreed to purchase from said corporation a parcel of land in Los Angeles County. In addition plaintiffs sought to recover the amount paid by them under the contract together with interest thereon. From a judgment in favor of plaintiffs decreeing rescission of the contract and permitting recovery of the purchase price with interest, the defendant Alta Canyada Corporation has appealed.

The ground upon which rescission was granted was that prior…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Colton v. StanfordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Munson v. FishburnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
  3. Hayt v. BentelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
  4. Wilson v. Rigali & VeselichCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
  5. Crim v. UmbsenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Hanberry v. Hearst Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1969
  2. Scheherezade Sharabianlou v. KarpCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
  3. Blank v. Olcovich Shoe Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1937
  4. Mueller v. MacBanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
  5. William Whitman Co. v. Universal Oil Products Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 1954

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API