Oppenheimer v. Clunie
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
COOPER, C.
Plaintiff had judgment. Defendant made a motion for a new trial, which was denied, and this appeal is from the judgment and order.
On the thirty-first day of October, 1900, the defendant, by a written lease, let to the plaintiff the premises known as the Clunie Opera House in the city of Sacramento for the term of five years from and after the first day of December, 1900, at the rental of five hundred and fifty dollars per month, payable monthly in advance. Plaintiff entered into possession of the premises and paid the rent each month, as provided for in the lease, up to the latter…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Grimes v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
- Southern Development Co. v. SilvaSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- Colton v. StanfordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
- Bailey v. FoxCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
- Marten v. Paul O. Burns Wine Co.California Supreme Court · 1893
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- Liodas v. SahadiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
- Leeper v. BeltramiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
- Estate of DolbeerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
- The Edward Barron Estate Co. v. the Woodruff Co.California Supreme Court · 1912
- Carpenter v. HamiltonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.