Legal Opinion

Elliott v. Southern Pacific Co.

California Supreme Court

Decided November 25, 1904No. S.F. No. 2988PublishedCited by 6 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtAngellotti, J.

Defendant appeals from a judgment rendered in favor of plaintiff for the sum of seven hundred dollars, and from an order denying its motion for new trial. The action was for damages alleged to have been suffered by plaintiff by reason of his alleged wrongful and forcible expulsion from a train of defendant on August 13, 1894, on .which train, it was alleged, the plaintiff was a passenger.

The case was tried without a jury. The record shows the following facts: On August 13, 1894, the plaintiff boarded defendant’s train at the Oakland pier, Alameda County, for the purpose of being transported…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Colton v. StanfordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Bland v. Southern Pacific R.R.California Supreme Court · 1880
  3. Lundy v. Cent. Pac. R.R.California Supreme Court · 1884
  4. Rahilly v. St. Paul & Duluth RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1896
  5. L. R. & F. S. Railway v. DeanSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1884

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Craig v. SheaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
  2. Elliott v. Federated Fruit & Vegetable Growers, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1930
  3. Greenawalt v. RogersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
  4. Mason v. Seaboard Air Line Railway Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1912
  5. Mason v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1912

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API