Maxon-Nowlin Co. v. Norswing
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
SLOSS J.
This action was brought to recover damages for alleged fraudulent misrepresentations in connection with a transfer of real property.
The complaint alleges that on May 29, 1911, the plaintiff was the owner of a tract of land in Orange County, and the defendant was the owner- of a parcel of land, fronting on Main Street and Slauson Avenue in the city of Los Angeles. On said day, it is alleged, and prior thereto, the defendant represented to plaintiff that the said parcel had a frontage on Main Street of 398 feet and a depth on Slauson Avenue of 661 feet. The plaintiff fully believed said…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Colton v. StanfordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
- Nounnan v. Sutter County Land Co.California Supreme Court · 1889
- Eichelberger v. Mills Land & Water Co.California Court of Appeal · 1908
- Sullivan v. CrewCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
- Sussman v. San Luis Obispo CountyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Teague v. HallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
- Schader v. WhiteCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
- Shearer v. CooperCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
- Werline v. AldredSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
- West v. Great Western Power Co.California Court of Appeal · 1940
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.