Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Wolfe v. Severns

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 10, 1930No. Docket No. 76PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WARNER, J., pro tem.

This action arose out of the pretended sale of certain oil-well equipment, consisting of a derrick, tanks, tools, etc. James, Price and Richards owned certain oil leases and oil-well equipment at Huntington Beach, Orange County, California. They were in financial difficulties and made an assignment of their interest in said leases and said equipment to a certain creditors’ committee consisting of Spraul, Fairchild and Gale. Said creditors’ committee had certain negotiations with Clarence R. Bailey, Pearl R. Bailey, his wife, W. J. White, and Mamie B. White, his wife,…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Southern Development Co. v. SilvaSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
  2. Colton v. StanfordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  3. Ryder v. BambergerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
  4. Wendling Lumber Co. v. Glenwood Lumber Co.California Supreme Court · 1908
  5. Everett v. Standard Accident InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Liodas v. SahadiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Podlasky v. PriceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
  3. MacCo Construction Co. v. FickertCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
  4. K. King and G. Shuler Corp. v. KingCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
  5. Goggin v. Reliance InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API