Legal Opinion

Cullen v. Glendora Water Co.

California Supreme Court

Decided July 25, 1896No. 19360PublishedCited by 28 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the County of Los Angeles and from an order denying a new trial. Walter Van Dyke, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtBeatty, C. J.

This cause was formerly heard and decided by the court in Bank, upon grounds stated by Commissioner Vanclief in an opinion rendered herein on the 11th of March, 1895, post, p. 510. The case arises *505out of a special proceeding under an act supplemental to the Wright act for obtaining a decree of court approving and confirming the regularity of the issue of the bonds of an irrigation district. By the decree of the superior court the proceedings for the formation of the district, and the issuance of the bonds, were held to have been regular, and the bonds were declared valid. By the decision here…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. In re the Bonds of the Madera Irrigation DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  2. City of Pasadena v. StimsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Board of Directors of Modesto Irrigation District v. TregeaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  4. Darcy v. Mayor of San JoseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
  5. Central Irrigation District v. De LappeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. The Title & Document Restoration Co. v. KerriganCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
  2. Deyoe v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
  3. Davy v. McNeillNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1925
  4. City of Tulare v. HevrenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
  5. In Re Sutter-Butte By-Pass Assessment No. 6California Supreme Court · 1923

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API