City of Pasadena v. Stimson
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtBeatty, C. J.
Proceeding under sections 1237 et seq. of the Code of Civil Procedure to condemn a right of way for an outfall sewer from the city of Pasadena to a tract of land outside of the city limits known as the sewer farm. Appeal by defendants from a decree of condemnation..
The city of Pasadena,—a municipal corporation in the county of Los Angeles, — for the purpose, as it alleges, of promoting the health, comfort, and convenience of its inhabitants, is engaged in constructing a system of sewerage, whereby it proposes to discharge the city sewage upon a farm distant about four and a half miles from…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Abeel v. ClarkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
- People ex rel. Daniels v. HenshawCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
- Brooks v. HydeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1869
- Miller v. KisterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1885
- New York & Harlem Railroad v. KipNew York Court of Appeals · 1871
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by178 opinions
- Hassan v. Mercy American River HospitalCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
- Waite v. Santa CruzSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
- People v. Western Fruit GrowersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
- Matter of Application of MillerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
- County of Alameda v. JanssenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
173 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.