Legal Opinion

In Re Sutter-Butte By-Pass Assessment No. 6

California Supreme Court

Decided August 22, 1923No. Sac. No. 3405PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLennon, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment of the superior court, in and for the county of Sutter, three ■judges sitting, purporting to validate an assessment, aggregating in value some eight millions of dollars, spread over certain lands of and in the Sacramento and San Joaquin Drainage District.

The controversy presented upon the appeal had its origin in the adoption, in the form of a legislative enactment by the legislature of the state of California, of the report of the California Debris Commission, which provided a plan for the flood control of the Sacramento River. (Stats. 1911 (Ex. Sees.), p.…

2Cases cited47 opinions

  1. Davidson v. New OrleansSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  2. Fallbrook Irrigation District v. BradleySupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  3. Gray v. Reclamation District No. 1500California Supreme Court · 1917
  4. Duncan v. RamishCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  5. People Ex Rel. Chapman v. Sacramento Drainage Dist.California Supreme Court · 1909

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Martin v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
  2. People v. SkinnerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  3. Rainey v. MichelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
  4. Sacramento & San Joaquin Drainage District v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
  5. Beckley v. Reclamation BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API