Legal Opinion
Davy v. McNeill
New Mexico Supreme Court
Decided October 9, 1925No. 3073PublishedCited by 51 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
BRICE, District Judge
(after stating the facts as above). 1. Chapter 41 of the New Mexico Session Laws of 1919 is a comprehensive act, providing for the organization of irrigation districts in New Mexico. The subject of the act as stated in the title is “An act in relation to irrigation districts.” Section 16, article 4, of the New -Mexico Constitution, is:
“The subject of every bill shall be clearly expressed in its title, and no bill embracing- more than one subject shall be passed except g-eneral appropriation bills and bills for the codification or revision of the laws;…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Fallbrook Irrigation District v. BradleySupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- Robb v. ConnollySupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- French v. Barber Asphalt Paving Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1901
- Orient Insurance v. DaggsSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
- Houck v. Little River Drainage DistrictSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by51 opinions
- Howell Ex Rel. Howell v. BurkNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1977
- Espanola Housing Authority v. AtencioNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1977
- Lehi City v. Meiling, City RecorderUtah Supreme Court · 1935
- City of Raton v. SprouleNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1967
- Gruschus Ex Rel. Estate of Adams v. Bureau of RevenueNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1965
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.