City of Tulare v. Hevren
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Tulare County. Wheaton A. Gray, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
COOPER, C.
—The court below sustained a demurrer to the ■complaint, and plaintiff declined to amend. Judgment was thereupon entered for defendants. Plaintiff appeals from the judgment. The complaint shows substantially that ordinance Ho. 66 of the plaintiff requires all parties desiring to obtain a license for the purpose of conducting the business of selling ■spirituous liquors at retail in the city of Tulare to file with the board of «trustees a recommendation by parties owning real estate within the block where the business is to be conducted, "to the effect that the applicant is a person…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- City of Pasadena v. StimsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Miller v. KisterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1885
- Welsh v. BramletCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- Cullen v. Glendora Water Co.California Supreme Court · 1896
- Ex parte DavisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- Laisne v. California State Board of OptometryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Clements v. T. R. Bechtel Co.California Supreme Court · 1954
- Burns v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
- Simpson v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
- Miller & Lux, Inc. v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.