Board of Directors of Modesto Irrigation District v. Tregea
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Stanislaus County, and from an order denying a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtBeatty, C. J.
This is a special proceeding instituted in pursuance of the act of March 16, 1889 (Stats. 1889, p. 212), for the purpose of obtaining judicial confirmation of the validity of certain bonds of the respondent which it has ordered to be issued and sold.
The act referred to is supplemental to the act entitled “An act to provide for the organization and government of irrigation districts, and to provide for the acquisition of water and other property,‘and for the distribution of water thereby for irrigation purposes,” approved March 7, 1887, and commonly known as the Wright law. (Stats. 1887, p.…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Lent v. TillsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
- Turlock Irrigation District v. WilliamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
- People v. HagarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1877
- People v. HagarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1884
3Cited by60 opinions
- In re the Bonds of the Madera Irrigation DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- People Ex Rel. Chapman v. Sacramento Drainage Dist.California Supreme Court · 1909
- Los Angeles County Flood Control District v. HamiltonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
- Inglin v. HoppinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
- In re Organization & of the Bonds of the Central Irrigation DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.