Legal Opinion

Abrams v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided August 4, 2003No. 01-348CPublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

HODGES, Judge.

Plaintiffs are healthcare personnel who receive premium pay for working nights, weekends, and holidays. Defendant has not paid plaintiffs such premiums when they have taken annual leave or sick leave. Plaintiffs move to certify a class of workers whom the Government has denied premium pay in such circumstances. We must deny certification because plaintiffs do not meet the requirements of Rule 23 or related case law in this court.

DISCUSSION

I

Plaintiffs are registered nurses, nurse anesthetists, licensed practical or vocational nurses, physician assistants, dental…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Quinault Allottee Ass'n v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1972
  2. Willems Industries, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1961
  3. Lanehart v. HornerCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
  4. Moore v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1998
  5. Buchan v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1992

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Barnes v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2005
  2. Jaynes v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2006
  3. Curry v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2008
  4. Fisher v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2006
  5. Filosa v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2006

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API