Barnes v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
ALLEGRA, Judge.
Pending before the court, after briefing and oral argument, is plaintiffs’ motion to certify a class action under RCFC 23. For the reasons that follow, this court grants plaintiffs’ motion.
I
Briefly, plaintiffs are civilian employees of the Department of the Navy (the Navy)— Joseph Barnes is a member of the facility staff; Kaylene Holub is a computer operator; and Socorro Yosuico is a clinical nurse. The Navy pays plaintiffs and certain other employees premium pay for working nights and weekends, or holidays, on a regular basis. See 5 U.S.C. §§ 5545, 5546. Plaintiffs,…
2Cases cited78 opinions
- Amchem Products, Inc. v. WindsorSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- General Telephone Co. of Southwest v. FalconSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- United States v. SherwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Eisen v. Carlisle & JacquelinSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Coopers & Lybrand v. LivesaySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
73 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by63 opinions
- Bright v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2010
- Haggart v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2009
- Jaynes v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2006
- King v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2008
- Curry v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2008
58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.