Legal Opinion

Barnes v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided November 3, 2005No. 04-1335 CPublishedCited by 63 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

ALLEGRA, Judge.

Pending before the court, after briefing and oral argument, is plaintiffs’ motion to certify a class action under RCFC 23. For the reasons that follow, this court grants plaintiffs’ motion.

I

Briefly, plaintiffs are civilian employees of the Department of the Navy (the Navy)— Joseph Barnes is a member of the facility staff; Kaylene Holub is a computer operator; and Socorro Yosuico is a clinical nurse. The Navy pays plaintiffs and certain other employees premium pay for working nights and weekends, or holidays, on a regular basis. See 5 U.S.C. §§ 5545, 5546. Plaintiffs,…

2Cases cited78 opinions

  1. Amchem Products, Inc. v. WindsorSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  2. General Telephone Co. of Southwest v. FalconSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. United States v. SherwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  4. Eisen v. Carlisle & JacquelinSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  5. Coopers & Lybrand v. LivesaySupreme Court of the United States · 1978

73 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by63 opinions

  1. Bright v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2010
  2. Haggart v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2009
  3. Jaynes v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2006
  4. King v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2008
  5. Curry v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2008

58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API