Legal Opinion
Lanehart v. Horner
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided May 14, 1987No. Appeal No. 86-595PublishedCited by 53 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ARCHER, Circuit Judge.
Appellants appeal from the judgment of the United States District Court for the District of Maryland in Lanehart v. Devine, 615 F.Supp. 1300 (D.Md.1985), granting appellees’ motion for summary judgment, and conversely denying appellants’ motion for summary judgment. At issue is the quantum of “pay” to which appellants were and are entitled during authorized absences from work under the “leave with pay” provisions of 5 U.S.C. §§ 6303, 6307, 6322, 6323 (1982). We reverse and remand.
Background
The facts are undisputed. Appellants are federal employees who are employed as…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Udall v. TallmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Red Lion Broadcasting Co. v. Federal Communications CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Bob Jones University v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Aaron v. Securities & Exchange CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- CBS, Inc. v. Federal Communications CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by53 opinions
- Barnes v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2005
- Abbey v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2014
- Bull v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2005
- Kelly Butterbaugh, Roseanne T. Faltin, John C. Marderness, Robert J. Bono v. Department of JusticeCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2003
- Constance Horner, Director, Office of Personnel Management v. Joseph D. JeffreyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.