Legal Opinion
Fisher v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided January 6, 2006No. 04-1726TPublishedCited by 31 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
GEORGE W. MILLER, Judge.
This matter is before the Court on plaintiffs Motion for Class Certification pursuant to Rule 23 of the Rules of the Court of Federal Claims (“RCFC”). Oral argument was deemed unnecessary. For the reasons set forth below, plaintiffs Motion for Class Certification is DENIED without prejudice.
BACKGROUND1
On June 28, 1990, plaintiff Seymour P. Nagan Irrevocable Trust (“the Trust”) acquired a $500,000 face amount life insurance policy issued by Sun Life Assurance Compa*195ny of Canada (“Sun Life Assurance”). Pl.’s Proposed Findings of Uncontroverted Fact U1. At…
2Cases cited54 opinions
- Amchem Products, Inc. v. WindsorSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Lewis v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Wanda Jenkins v. Raymark Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1986
- Mary Jane Forbush v. J.C. Penney Company, Inc., Pension PlanCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1993
- Demarco v. EdensCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1968
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Haggart v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2009
- King v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2008
- Curry v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2008
- Geneva Rock Products, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
- Fauvergue v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2009
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.