Legal Opinion

Moore v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided July 2, 1998No. 93-134 LPublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BRUGGINK, Judge.

Pending is plaintiffs’ motion to certify this case as a class action. Plaintiffs own property traversed by the Katy Trail, a recreational trail located between Machens and Sedalia, Missouri. They assert there are over 2000 potential class members who likewise own property along the Katy Trail. They claim compensation under the Fifth Amendment for property taken by the United States when it prevented the reversion of their fee interests to lands underlying railroads by interposing a recreational trail used by the general public. The motion was briefed on two occasions,…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Preseault v. Interstate Commerce CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  2. Quinault Allottee Ass'n v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1972
  3. Brown v. WeareSupreme Court of Missouri · 1941
  4. Hage v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1996
  5. Pollnow v. Department of Natural ResourcesWisconsin Supreme Court · 1979

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Glosemeyer v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2000
  2. Haggart v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2009
  3. King v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2008
  4. Curry v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2008
  5. Beroth Oil Co. v. North Carolina Department of TransportationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2014

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API