Filosa v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR CLASS CERTIFICATION
BRADEN, Judge.
On May 1, 2002, the United States Court of Federal Claims substantially revised the rule for class action certification to conform to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure (“FRCP”) 23. See RCFC 23, Rules Comm. Note (“RCFC 23 has been completely rewritten. Although the court’s rule is modeled largely on the comparable FRCP [23], there are significant differences.”).1 To date, the *611United States Court of Federal Claims has issued six opinions analyzing revised RCFC 28.2 Although only one class was certified…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Amchem Products, Inc. v. WindsorSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- General Telephone Co. of Southwest v. FalconSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- United States v. SherwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Eisen v. Carlisle & JacquelinSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Coopers & Lybrand v. LivesaySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Haggart v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2009
- King v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2008
- Curry v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2008
- Geneva Rock Products, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
- Fauvergue v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2009
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.