Hodgdon v. S. Pac. R.R Co.
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the city and county of San Francisco, and from an order refusing a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtMcFarland, J.
Judgment in the lower court went for plaintiff, and from the judgment and an order denying a new trial defendants appeal.
Plaintiff avers in the complaint (substantially), and the court finds, that in April, 1862, James H. Hodgdon *643died seised as owner in fee of certain land in the city and county of San Francisco, described in the complaint; that plaintiff was born in lawful wedlock on June 23, 1860, and was and is the sole child of said James H. Hodgdon, deceased; that said James H. Hodgdon on October 12, 1850, made and published his last will, by which he devised and bequeathed all his…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Carpentier v. City of OaklandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1866
- Herron v. DaterSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
- Chase v. ChristiansonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1871
- Robb v. RobbCalifornia Supreme Court · 1856
- Fitts v. FittsTexas Supreme Court · 1858
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Hill v. City Cab & Transfer Co.California Supreme Court · 1889
- People Ex Rel. Fogg v. Perris Irrigation DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
- Bennett v. WilsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
- Guardianship of BoutzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
- O'Brien v. United Bank & Trust Co.California Court of Appeal · 1929
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.