Adams v. Lambard
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of El Dorado County, and from an order denying a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtPaterson, J.
This action was commenced by Horace Adams, plaintiff's testator, on September 2, 1880, for an accounting, and to compel the defendant to convey to him an undivided one-third interest in the Mount Pleasant mine. When the plaintiff learned, from the answer to his complaint, that the defendant had conveyed the property to innocent purchasers, and that a specific performance of the contract to reconvey was impossible, he filed an amended complaint, alleging the value of the mine, and praying that if it should appear from the evidence that a specific performance could not be enforced, a judgment…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Brison v. BrisonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
- Feeney v. HowardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
- Love v. WatkinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1871
- Janes v. ThrockmortonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881
- Sandfoss v. JonesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1868
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Lauricella v. LauricellaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
- Alaniz v. CasenaveCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Estate of CousinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- People Ex Rel. Fogg v. Perris Irrigation DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
- Nordholt v. NordholtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.