Legal Opinion

Joyce v. McAvoy

California Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1866PublishedCited by 21 opinions

Appeal from the District Court, Twelfth Judicial District, City and County of San Francisco. Plaintiff recovered judgment in the Court below, and defendants appealed. The other facts are stated in the opinion of the Court.

1Opinion of the Court

By the Court, Sawyer, J.:

This is an action to recover a lot in San Francisco. On the 27th day of January, 1847, one John Joyce, father of the plaintiff, became the owner in fee of the premises in controversy by virtue of a grant made by Alcalde Bartlett. At that time, Joyce was a married man, living with his family, consisting of a wife, Caroline A. Joyce, and two infant daughters, Augusta Joyce, the plaintiff, and Helen Frances Joyce. In March, 1851, Joyce ahd wife conveyed the fifty-vara lot, of which the said premises are a part, to one E. V. Joyce, upon a consideration of six thousand…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Head v. FordyceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1860
  2. Regla v. MartinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1861

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Castro v. BarryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
  2. People Ex Rel. Fogg v. Perris Irrigation DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
  3. California Oil & Gas Co. of Arizona v. MillerU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern California · 1899
  4. Stevens v. KelleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
  5. Wilson v. HubbardWashington Supreme Court · 1905

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API