Legal Opinion

Drinkhouse v. Van Ness

California Supreme Court

Decided October 31, 1927No. Docket Nos. S.F. 10733, 3552PublishedCited by 65 opinions

Cooley & Gallagher and Goodfellow, Eells & Orrick for Appellant.

1Opinion of the CourtWaste, C. J.

This case holds the record in this jurisdiction for Rip Van Winkle litigation. The action was initiated in the lower court on the twenty-ninth day of January, 1896. A complaint in intervention was filed August 31, 1899, and various and amended pleadings were interposed. On the thirty-first day of May, 1900, a jury rendered a verdict for the plaintiffs, and judgment was entered against one of the defendants and against the intervener. Notices of appeal from the judgment were filed in July following. In May, 1902, the trial court entered an order and an amended order on motion to vacate…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Holtum v. GriefCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  2. Kaufman v. ShainCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Kent v. WilliamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
  4. Boa v. San Francisco-Oakland Terminal Rys.California Supreme Court · 1920
  5. Biaggi v. RamontCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by65 opinions

  1. Clemmer v. Hartford Insurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Viner v. UntrechtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
  3. Stevens v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
  4. Uzyel v. KadishaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
  5. Shea v. City of San BernardinoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936

60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API