Legal Opinion

Baldwin-Lima-Hamilton Corp. v. Superior Court

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 24, 1962No. Civ. 20694PublishedCited by 60 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSullivan, J.

Petitioner Baldwin-Lima-Hamilton Corporation, hereafter referred to as Baldwin, seeks a writ of prohibition restraining the respondent superior court from taking further action in a mandamus proceeding pending therein, except such as may be necessary to deny a peremptory writ of mandate, discharge the alternative writ issued, and dissolve an injunction pendente lite.

The following background facts appear to he generally undisputed. On July 6, 1961, the purchasing department of the City and County of San Francisco, acting under the direction of Ben Benas, purchaser of supplies of said city,…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Abelleira v. District Court of AppealCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  2. United States v. PinkSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  3. United States v. BelmontSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
  4. Clark v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  5. Faulkner v. California Toll Bridge AuthorityCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by60 opinions

  1. Glendale City Employees' Ass'n v. City of GlendaleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Santa Clara County Counsel Attorneys Ass'n v. WoodsideCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Bogacki v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  4. Shoei Kako Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973
  5. City of Oakland v. Oakland Police & Fire Retirement SystemCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014

55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API