Legal Opinion

Pacific States S. & L. Co. v. O'Neill

California Supreme Court

Decided October 27, 1936No. S. F. 15615PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtThompson, J.

The defendants appeal from a judgment rendered in favor of the plaintiff in an action in unlawful detainer brought pursuant to the provisions of section 1161a of the Code of Civil Procedure, after sale of the property to plaintiff by the trustee named in a deed of trust given to secure the repayment of $55,000 and interest thereon. In essence, the contentions relied upon by appellants may be stated as follows:

1. The sale was void because the note and trust deed provided for payment in gold coin of the United States, whereas the notice of default, the notice of sale, and the bid all proceeded…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Humboldt Sav. Bank v. McClevertyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
  2. Mersfelder v. SpringCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
  3. Bank of Sonoma County v. CharlesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  4. Cobb v. California BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
  5. Security-First National Bank v. De La CuestaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Ames v. PardueSupreme Court of Alabama · 1980
  2. Holland v. Pendleton Mortgage Co.California Court of Appeal · 1943
  3. Taliaferro v. CrolaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
  4. Pacific States Savings & Loan Co. v. PainterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
  5. Delpy v. OnoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API