Legal Opinion
Security-First National Bank v. De La Cuesta
California Court of Appeal
Decided July 9, 1936No. Civ. 10546PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SHINN, J., pro tem.
Appeal from a judgment for the recovery of possession of real property by the purchaser of the same at trustee’s sale under a trust deed.
Plaintiff’s demurrer on general and special grounds to defendant’s answer was sustained without leave to amend. Leave to amend was not requested and judgment was thereupon entered in favor of plaintiff for possession of the real property. The sufficiency of the various allegations of the answer will be considered in connection with the several points made by appellant to which they relate, all of which are urged in support of the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Norman v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Mortgage Guarantee Co. v. SmithCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
- Crandall v. Title Guarantee and Trust Co.California Court of Appeal · 1934
- Merchants National Trust & Savings Bank v. SnellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
3Cited by5 opinions
- Py v. PleitnerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945
- Pacific States S. & L. Co. v. O'NeillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
- Peterson v. Corporation of AmericaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
- Security-First National Bank v. BennettCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
- Durst v. BattsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937