Taliaferro v. Crola
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtDraper, J.
This is an action to quiet title. Plaintiff claims under deed and assignment from William S. Newman and wife, given in 1955. In 1950, the Newmans had executed a deed of trust naming the predecessor of defendant bank as beneficiary. Notice of default was filed and the property was sold under the power of sale contained in this deed of trust. Defendant Crola was the purchaser at this sale, which occurred after the deed and assignment to plaintiff. Defendant Hemleb is not a party named in any of the documents of title. Neither he nor the bank asserts any present title to the real property here…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Burris v. KennedyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
- Hession v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
- Central National Bank v. BellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
- Jose Realty Co. v. PavlicevichCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
- Warden v. StollCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Leeper v. BeltramiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
- Munger v. MooreCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
- Melendrez v. D & I INVESTMENT, INC.California Court of Appeal · 2005
- Apparel Manufacturers' Supply Co. v. National Automobile & Casualty InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
- Whitman v. Transtate Title Co.California Court of Appeal · 1985
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.