Legal Opinion

Cobb v. California Bank

California Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1936No. L. A. 15655PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCurtis, J.

Motion to dismiss appeal or affirm judgment on the ground that the appeal is taken for delay only, and the questions upon which the decision of the cause depends, are so unsubstantial as not to require further argument.

The points relied upon by appellants in their briefs are (1) In the sale of real property under a trust deed, where a number of continuances were had, the sale was illegal when the only notices of such continuances were given orally at the time of such continuances, and (2) No notice of sale was posted upon the premises to be sold, as required by section 692, subdivision 3 of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Central National Bank v. BellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
  2. Craig v. BuckleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
  3. Sorensen v. HallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934
  4. Alameda County Home Investment Co. v. WhitakerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Birkhofer v. KrummCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
  2. Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'n v. McLaughlin Land & Livestock Co.California Court of Appeal · 1940
  3. United States Cold Storage v. Great Western Savings & Loan Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
  4. Lancaster Security Investment Corp. v. KesslerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
  5. Holland v. Pendleton Mortgage Co.California Court of Appeal · 1943

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API