Legal Opinion

Humboldt Sav. Bank v. McCleverty

California Supreme Court

Decided November 7, 1911No. S.F. No. 5572PublishedCited by 41 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtSloss, J.

The action was brought to recover possession of a lot of land situated on Harrison Street in the city of Oakland. This is the second appeal. Upon the first appeal a judgment in favor of the defendant was reversed and the cause remanded with leave to the defendant to file amended or additional pleadings as she might be advised. (Weber v. McClev erty, 149 Cal. 316, [86 Pac. 706].) During the pendency of the action, Weber, the original plaintiff, died, and Humboldt Savings Bank has been substituted for him.

The land involved, together with another parcel of land situated on Broadway Street in…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Savings & Loan Society v. BurnettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Drury v. CrossSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
  3. Weber v. McClevertyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
  4. Copsey v. Sacramento BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
  5. Garland v. WatsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1883

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. Brewer v. SimpsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
  2. Farrell v. County of PlacerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  3. Lona v. Citibank, N.A.California Court of Appeal · 2011
  4. Karlsen v. American Savings & Loan Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
  5. Times-Mirror Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API