Legal Opinion

Pacific States Savings & Loan Co. v. Painter

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 7, 1940No. Civ. No. 11335PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNourse, P. J.

Defendants appeal upon a bill of exceptions from a judgment favoring plaintiffs in an action to recover a deficiency after sale under a deed of trust.

On April 12, 1935, plaintiffs sued to recover the balance due upon the joint note of defendants executed on February 6, 1929, for $8,350. The balance alleged to be due after deducting payments and adding interest, advances made under' the deed of trust, and trustee’s fees and expenses, was $2,044.06. After a fair and full trial of the issues judgment was entered for plaintiffs in that amount.

Two questions are raised by appellants—the sufficiency…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Brown v. FerdonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
  2. Birkhofer v. KrummCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
  3. Pacific States S. & L. Co. v. O'NeillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
  4. Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'n v. Burg Bros.California Court of Appeal · 1939

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Wolf v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
  2. Ware v. HellerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
  3. Northwestern Sheet & Iron Works v. County of SiouxNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1949
  4. Ferrier v. Commercial Steel Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1956
  5. DC Media Capital v. Imagine Fulfillment Services CA2/1California Court of Appeal · 2013

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API