Legal Opinion

Ames v. Pardue

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided September 12, 1980No. 79-169, 79-215PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This is an appeal from a judgment of the trial court which set aside a mortgage foreclosure sale and restored the plaintiff's equity of redemption on the grounds that the land was offered for sale en masse rather than in parcels. The plaintiff-appellee, Mary Jane Gantt Pardue, is the mortgagor of the property concerned, and the appellants-defendants, Central Bank of Birmingham and John B. Ames, are respectively the mortgagee and the purchaser of the property at the foreclosure sale. We reverse and remand for reinstatement of the foreclosure sale.

Beginning in 1951, plaintiff J. Bruce Pardue, a…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Kelly v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of Alabama · 1928
  2. Jordan & Sons v. PickettSupreme Court of Alabama · 1884
  3. Bank of New Brockton v. DunnavantSupreme Court of Alabama · 1920
  4. Humboldt Sav. Bank v. McClevertyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
  5. Dozier v. FarriorSupreme Court of Alabama · 1914

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Ray v. MontgomerySupreme Court of Alabama · 1980
  2. Henson v. Celtic Life Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1993
  3. Muller v. SeedsSupreme Court of Alabama · 2005
  4. George v. Federal Land Bank of JacksonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1986
  5. Reynolds v. MitchellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1988

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API