Legal Opinion

Walton v. Walton

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 1, 1943No. Civ. 12120PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKnight, J.

The question here involved is whether under the facts disclosed by the record a husband, owning a joint tenancy interest with his wife in real property upon which she has declared a homestead for the benefit of herself, her husband and their minor child, may destroy the homestead rights of the wife by a forced sale of the property brought about through the medium of an action to partition the property. The trial court held in the negative, and the husband appeals.

The following are the facts: Subsequent to their marriage the parties acquired, as joint tenants, a parcel of land in Marin County…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Akley v. BassettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
  2. Hafer v. HaferSupreme Court of Kansas · 1885
  3. Riggs v. SterlingMichigan Supreme Court · 1886
  4. Swan v. WaldenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
  5. Watson v. PeytonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Barham v. BarhamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
  2. Rauer's Collection Co. v. HigginsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
  3. Johnson v. BraunerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
  4. Mullikin v. JonesNevada Supreme Court · 1955
  5. Drake v. DrakeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1955

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API