Legal Opinion

Swan v. Walden

California Supreme Court

Decided August 23, 1909No. L.A. No. 2293PublishedCited by 39 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtHenshaw, J.

This is an appeal from the judgment and from an order denying a motion for new trial. The action was for the partition of lots 3, 4, and 5 in block L in the city of Redlands. While defendants Edward Walden and Louella, his wife, appellant herein, were the admitted owners of these lots under deeds hereinafter to be considered, Louella made a declaration of homestead on lots 3 and 4, where she and her husband resided. Subsequently, the homestead never having been abandoned, the husband executed a deed of grant of all of his interest in the lots to plaintiff ' Swan. Judgment passed for…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Frost v. FrostSupreme Court of Missouri · 1906
  2. Thornburg v. WigginsIndiana Supreme Court · 1893
  3. Wolf v. FleischackerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1855
  4. Higgins v. HigginsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1873
  5. Schoonover v. BirnbaumCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. Delanoy v. DelanoyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Rauer's Collection Co. v. HigginsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
  3. Sewell v. PriceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
  4. Watson v. PeytonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
  5. Strangman v. DukeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API