Riggs v. Sterling
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Wayne. (Chambers, J.) Ejectment. Plaintiff brings error. The facts-are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtSherwood, J.
The action in this case is ejectment, to recover the possession of less than forty acres of land- situate *645■in the county of Wayne, and not included in any town plat, ■city, or village. It was purchased by William Sterling, the husband of the defendant, in 1874, and was used and •occupied by them as their homestead until the sixth day of March, 1883, when the husband died, and the defendant has made the same her home, continuing the occupancy thereof by herself and tenants up to the time of commencing this ■suit.
The husband, desiring that his wife should have the property in case óf his death,…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- Beecher v. BaldyMichigan Supreme Court · 1859
- Wallace v. HarrisMichigan Supreme Court · 1875
- Dye v. MannMichigan Supreme Court · 1862
- Snyder v. PeopleMichigan Supreme Court · 1872
- Showers v. RobinsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1880
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by43 opinions
- Andrews Et Ux. v. SEC. Bank of W. F.Texas Supreme Court · 1932
- Clark v. CoxSupreme Court of Florida · 1920
- Quigley v. McEvonyNebraska Supreme Court · 1894
- Kleinert v. LefkowitzMichigan Supreme Court · 1935
- Kimball v. SalisburyUtah Supreme Court · 1898
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.