Legal Opinion

Johnson v. Brauner

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 22, 1955No. Civ. 20469PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ASHBURN, J. pro tem. *

This ease turns upon the sufficiency of the form of a declaration of homestead made by plaintiff upon certain property owned by her and her husband as joint tenants.

On and prior to June 27, 1951, plaintiff-respondent Josephine A. Johnson and her husband James R. Johnson were vested as joint tenants with title to the real property in question; on that day the husband, without consideration, executed a quitclaim deed in favor of the wife, same being recorded two days later. On the day of the deed, the 27th, defendant-appellant Brauner caused an attachment to be levied upon…

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. Yager v. YagerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
  2. Cunha v. HughesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
  3. Swan v. WaldenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
  4. In Re the Estate of FathCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
  5. Watson v. PeytonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Schoenfeld v. NorbergCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
  2. Strangman v. DukeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
  3. Matcha v. WinnCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1981
  4. In Re AnciraUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. California · 1980
  5. Viotti v. GiomiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API