Johnson v. Brauner
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
ASHBURN, J. pro tem. *
This ease turns upon the sufficiency of the form of a declaration of homestead made by plaintiff upon certain property owned by her and her husband as joint tenants.
On and prior to June 27, 1951, plaintiff-respondent Josephine A. Johnson and her husband James R. Johnson were vested as joint tenants with title to the real property in question; on that day the husband, without consideration, executed a quitclaim deed in favor of the wife, same being recorded two days later. On the day of the deed, the 27th, defendant-appellant Brauner caused an attachment to be levied upon…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Yager v. YagerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
- Cunha v. HughesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
- Swan v. WaldenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
- In Re the Estate of FathCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
- Watson v. PeytonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Schoenfeld v. NorbergCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
- Strangman v. DukeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
- Matcha v. WinnCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1981
- In Re AnciraUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. California · 1980
- Viotti v. GiomiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.