Legal Opinion

Mullikin v. Jones

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided January 11, 1955No. 3776PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By the Court,

Badt, J.:

The main two questions presented on this appeal are:

A. When premises are held by a husband and wife as joint tenants, does the occupancy of said premises as a home prevent alienation by the husband of his interest without the wife’s joining in the conveyance? Or, differently expressed, does an undeclared homestead under such circumstances, fall within the constitutional and statutory prohibition against unilateral alienation by the husband?

B. Where property occupied by a husband and wife as their home is held by them in joint tenancy, is a transmutation from such…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Tomaier v. TomaierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Siberell v. SiberellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
  3. Huber v. HuberCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  4. Delanoy v. DelanoyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
  5. Estate of WatkinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Peters v. PetersNevada Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Stockdale v. StockdaleIdaho Court of Appeals · 1982
  3. Weeks v. WeeksNevada Supreme Court · 1956
  4. Home Savings & Loan Association v. BatesNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1966
  5. In Re GreeneUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Nevada · 2006

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API