Legal Opinion

Akley v. Bassett

California Supreme Court

Decided September 22, 1922No. L. A. No. 6904PublishedCited by 98 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWaste, J.

action was commenced by the respondent, Josephine M. Akley, and several others, for the partition of 814 acres of land situated about fifteen miles from the city of Los Angeles, being a part of the Rancho La Puente, and to recover from the defendant Charles N. Bassett, who is the appellant here, their respective propor tionate shares of the rents, issues and profits of the alleged common property, received and retained by him.

The defendant appeals from an order of the trial court granting the motion of the plaintiff Josephine M. Akley to set aside the judgment theretofore entered against her…

2Cases cited48 opinions

  1. Pennoyer v. NeffSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  2. Arndt v. GriggsSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  3. Cahill v. Superior Court of S.F.California Supreme Court · 1904
  4. Emeric v. AlvaradoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1884
  5. Unger v. MooneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1883

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by98 opinions

  1. Phelan v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
  2. Newport v. HattonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
  3. Gerhard v. StephensCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  4. Johns v. ScobieCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
  5. Collier v. Merced Irrigation DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931

93 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API