Roller v. Stonewall Insurance Co.
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the CourtPetrich, J.
Daniel Roller appeals from a summary judgment denying him underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage for injuries he sustained due to the intentional acts of an uninsured driver. We reverse.
There are two issues on appeal: (1) whether a passenger is a user and thus an insured under the underinsured motorist coverage of the driver's liability policy at the time of the initial collision and later when the passenger left the car, immediately after impact, to examine the damage and to transcribe the license of the offending vehicle; and (2) whether coverage is precluded under the underinsured motorist…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Rau v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1978
- Wendle v. FarrowWashington Supreme Court · 1984
- Sears v. Grange Insurance Ass'nWashington Supreme Court · 1988
- Federated American Insurance v. RaynesWashington Supreme Court · 1977
- Sciascia v. American Ins. Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1982
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Roller v. Stonewall InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1990
- Greengo v. Public Employees Mut. Ins. Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1998
- Greengo v. Public Employees Mutual InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1998
- Cherry v. Truck Insurance ExchangeCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1995
- Lemmons v. Prudential Property & Casualty Ins. Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1994
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.