Roller v. Stonewall Insurance
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtGuy, J.
Respondent Roller brought a declaratory action to determine insurance coverage under an underinsured motorist claim. The trial court determined that the injuries incurred were not covered by underinsured motorist insurance and the appellate court reversed. At issue is whether the claimant was "using" the insured vehicle at the time of the incidents and whether an intentional act of a tortfeasor constitutes an "accident". We affirm the trial court and hold that there is no underinsured motorist coverage of claimant's injuries.
On December 17, 1985, Ernest Flattum drove Daniel Roller and…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- State Farm General Insurance v. EmersonWashington Supreme Court · 1984
- Morgan v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaWashington Supreme Court · 1976
- E-Z Loader Boat Trailers, Inc. v. Travelers Indemnity Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1986
- Grange Insurance Co. v. BrosseauWashington Supreme Court · 1989
- Hamilton v. Farmers Insurance Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1987
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by118 opinions
- Queen City Farms, Inc. v. Central Nat'l Ins. Co. of OmahaWashington Supreme Court · 1995
- McDonald v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1992
- Safeco Insurance Co. of America v. ButlerWashington Supreme Court · 1992
- Hayden v. Mutual of Enumclaw InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 2000
- Woo v. Fireman's Fund InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 2007
113 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.